The Emperor Who Wept
I. The Field of Crows
The crows came in thousands. Black clouds of them, descending on the coastal plain of Kalinga in eastern India, where the Daya River runs red into the Bay of Bengal. It is 261 BC, and the river is not red with clay. It is red with blood.
Emperor Ashoka of the Mauryan Empire stands on a ridge above the battlefield, surrounded by generals who congratulate him on his victory. Below, stretching to the horizon, is the arithmetic of conquest: 100,000 dead. Soldiers, yes, but also farmers who took up arms to defend their land. Old men. Boys. The wounded crying out for water that will not come. The dead being picked apart by carrion birds.
Ashoka is 35 years old. He has been emperor for eight years. He has expanded his grandfather Chandragupta's empire until it covers nearly the entire Indian subcontinent. Kalinga was the last major holdout—a prosperous coastal kingdom that refused to bend the knee. Ashoka brought his army, his war elephants, his iron discipline. Kalinga resisted. And then Kalinga broke.
This is what victory looks like.
Ashoka's generals wait for him to speak, to make the traditional proclamation: The enemy is crushed. Their kingdom is ours. Their wealth will fill our treasury. They wait for him to do what conquerors do—turn the dead into a number, a statistic, a measure of power.
Instead, the emperor is silent. He walks down from the ridge. He walks among the dead. He sees a young soldier, barely old enough to grow a beard, still clutching a broken spear. He sees an elderly woman collapsed beside an overturned cart, fleeing something that caught her anyway. He sees a child.
And something in Ashoka breaks.
The generals whisper nervously among themselves. The emperor has gone pale. His hands are shaking. He is staring at the field as if seeing it for the first time, as if the corpses have only just now become human beings.
One of the generals approaches cautiously: "Your Majesty, a great victory—"
Ashoka turns to him. His voice, when it comes, is barely a whisper: "What have I done?"
II. The Conversion
The ancient texts tell us that Ashoka encountered a Buddhist monk in the aftermath of Kalinga—a man who had somehow survived the slaughter, who walked through the carnage without fear, tending to the dying regardless of which side they had fought for. The monk's name is lost to history, but his words are not.
"You are a king," the monk said. "You have the power to create suffering or alleviate it. Every choice you make from this moment forward will multiply across your empire like ripples across a pond. The question is: what kind of ripples will you create?"
Ashoka returned to his capital, Pataliputra, and something unprecedented happened: a conqueror repented.
Not in private. Not in the vague, performative way rulers express regret to avoid consequences. Ashoka issued a series of edicts—Rock Edict XIII is the most famous—in which he publicly mourned what he had done and vowed never to do it again:
"The Beloved of the Gods [Ashoka's title] felt remorse. For when an independent country is conquered, people are killed, they die, or are deported. This the Beloved of the Gods finds very painful and grievous."
He did not minimize it. He did not justify it. He named it as grief and declared it intolerable.
And then he did something even more extraordinary: he spent the rest of his life—nearly 40 more years—trying to govern by a different principle. He called it Dhamma (a Pali word related to the Sanskrit Dharma)—not exactly "Buddhism," though he had converted to that faith, but a kind of universal ethical code based on compassion, non-violence, respect for all living beings, and just governance.
He ordered that trees be planted along roads to provide shade for travelers. He had wells dug and rest houses built. He established hospitals—not just for humans, but for animals. He reformed the judicial system to make it less brutal, banning torture and giving prisoners the right to appeal. He appointed special officials whose job was to travel the empire ensuring that his policies of compassion were actually being implemented, not just written down and ignored.
And he had his edicts carved into stone pillars and rock faces across his empire, from present-day Afghanistan to Bangladesh, so that no one could forget—including himself.
III. The Pillars That Remember
There are 33 surviving inscriptions of Ashoka's edicts scattered across South Asia. Some are carved into living rock on cliff faces. Others are inscribed on polished sandstone pillars, 40 to 50 feet tall, each topped with a capital featuring four lions standing back-to-back—the symbol that would, 2,300 years later, become the emblem of the modern Republic of India.
The pillars were placed at crossroads, in city centers, at the edges of the empire—wherever people gathered. They were written in the local languages: Prakrit, Greek, Aramaic. Ashoka wanted to be understood. He wanted his vow to be public and binding.
The pillars are confession and legislation, apology and constitution, all at once.
Some edicts address governance: fair trials, humane treatment of prisoners, religious tolerance. Others are almost tender—instructions to his officials to report to him at any hour, even if he's eating or resting, if there's urgent business concerning the welfare of the people. One edict bans the slaughter of certain animals. Another prohibits the burning of forests for agricultural expansion, to protect wildlife.
But the most striking thing about the pillars is their tone. They don't command from on high. They plead. They reason. They appeal to something in the reader that recognizes suffering and wants to alleviate it.
Rock Edict VI:
"I have ordered this to be written so that my sons and grandsons who may come after me should not think new conquests worth achieving. If they do conquer, let them take pleasure in moderation and mild punishments. Let them consider the only true conquest to be the conquest of Dhamma, which is valuable both in this world and the next."
This is a ruler speaking to the future, trying to bind his descendants to mercy, knowing he might fail. Knowing that empires run on ambition and violence. Knowing that his own transformation is fragile, and that the world defaults to cruelty unless someone fights against that default every single day.
The pillars stand in fields in modern India, weathered by 2,300 monsoons. Farmers plow around them. Children play near them. Tourists photograph them without always understanding what they're looking at.
But the stone still speaks. It says: A man who killed 100,000 people tried, for the rest of his life, to make amends. And he wrote down his attempts so that no one could say it didn't matter.
IV. The Question of Authenticity
We must ask: Was Ashoka's conversion genuine? Or was it political theater—a way to consolidate a vast, diverse empire by offering an ideology of tolerance and care that would appeal to conquered peoples tired of war?
The cynical reading is possible. Ashoka did not step down from the throne. He did not disband his army. He continued to govern, to collect taxes, to maintain the apparatus of empire. And some historians note that his inscriptions, while repudiating offensive war, never fully renounced the right to defend the empire's borders by force if necessary.
But consider this: If Ashoka's transformation was merely a calculated political strategy, it was a strategy unlike any other in the ancient world. No other ruler in antiquity saw fit to publicly repent for conquest. No other emperor thought it useful to his power to express grief over the deaths of his enemies. Ashoka had already won. Kalinga was his. If anything, expressing remorse was a risk—it could be seen as weakness, inviting rebellion.
And yet he did it.
More tellingly, he kept doing it. For decades. Long past the point where the political utility would have been exhausted. If it was performance, it was a performance he committed to for 40 years, during which he consistently chose policies that prioritized the welfare of his subjects—even animals—over displays of imperial might.
There's another way to read Ashoka's story: He was a human being who did something monstrous, saw himself clearly in the aftermath, and spent the rest of his life trying to be different. That's not sainthood. That's the hard, daily work of transformation. That's what it looks like when someone with absolute power chooses, every day, to wield it more gently than the day before.
Perhaps authenticity is the wrong question. Perhaps what matters is that Ashoka created a model—imperfect, incomplete, but real—of what it looks like for power to repent and reform. He showed that a ruler doesn't have to keep being the person they were at their worst. He demonstrated that institutions can be reshaped around compassion, that governance can aim at welfare rather than just order.
He proved it's possible to change. And he wrote it in stone so no one could forget it was possible.
V. The Pillar in the Village
In a village in Bihar, in northeastern India, there stands a pillar. It was erected by Ashoka's command around 250 BC. The capital with the four lions is long gone—it's in a museum now, protected behind glass. But the pillar itself remains, a shaft of polished sandstone rising from the earth like a prayer.
An old woman sits in its shade. It's early morning, and the pillar casts a long shadow across the dusty ground. Her grandchildren are playing nearby, chasing a ball made of bundled cloth. She doesn't read Sanskrit or Prakrit; the inscriptions are just marks to her, shapes worn smooth by centuries of weather. But she knows the story. Her grandmother told it to her, and her grandmother's grandmother told it to her grandmother.
The emperor who conquered everyone. The battle where the river ran red. The moment he saw what he had done and wept. The rest of his life trying to build instead of destroy.
She doesn't know if the story is true in all its details. But she knows the pillar is real. She knows it has stood here for more than 2,000 years. She knows that whoever ordered it carved was trying to say something important enough to outlast their own life.
Her grandson runs up to her, breathless, and asks, "Why is this here?"
She looks at the pillar, at the worn inscriptions, at the stone that has endured when everything else—the empire, the emperor, the cities, the armies—has turned to dust.
"To remind us," she says. "To remind us it's possible to change. To remind us that powerful people can choose to be good. To remind us that we're supposed to take care of each other."
The boy looks skeptical. He's eight. He's heard plenty of stories about powerful people, and none of them are about kindness.
"Did it work?" he asks.
The old woman looks at him, at the village around them, at the world that is sometimes brutal and sometimes tender, where every day someone chooses between cruelty and mercy, between taking and giving, between seeing others as human or as obstacles.
"Sometimes," she says. "For a while."
And then: "But the pillar is still here. So we keep trying."
VI. The Spine of a Nation
There's a metaphor buried in the geography of Ashoka's pillars. They're scattered across the subcontinent—from the Hindu Kush mountains in the west to the jungles of Bengal in the east, from the Himalayas in the north to the coasts in the south. They mark the extent of the Mauryan Empire at its height.
But they also function like a spine.
A spine holds a body upright. It provides structure and posture. It connects the head to the limbs, allowing coordinated movement. And when a spine is injured—when vertebrae are broken or misaligned—the whole body suffers.
Ashoka's pillars were meant to be the moral spine of his empire. They held it upright, reminded it of its posture, insisted that governance must be about care as much as control. They connected the emperor's intentions to the daily lives of his subjects, translating philosophy into policy, creed into action.
When Ashoka died around 232 BC, his empire collapsed within 50 years. The pillars remained, but the coherence they represented did not survive him. Later rulers ignored his edicts. Wars resumed. The memory of Dhamma faded into legend.
But the pillars stayed.
Two thousand years later, when India gained independence from British colonial rule in 1947, its founders—led by Jawaharlal Nehru and B.R. Ambedkar—chose Ashoka's lion capital as the official emblem of the new republic. Not the symbols of the Mughals, or the British, or any of the other empires that had ruled India. But the symbol left by a man who repented of conquest and tried to govern justly.
It was a deliberate message: This is the India we want to build. Not an empire of conquest, but a republic of compassion. Not rule by force, but governance by care.
Whether modern India lives up to that aspiration is a question each generation must answer for itself. But the symbol endures. The pillar endures. The memory of the possibility endures.
VII. The Ripples
The Buddhist monk's words to Ashoka: "Every choice you make will multiply across your empire like ripples across a pond."
What were the ripples of Ashoka's transformation?
First, the immediate ones: hospitals, rest houses, trees planted for shade, judicial reforms, bans on torture. These are measurable. These saved lives, reduced suffering, made the empire more livable for millions of people who would otherwise have been ground up by the machinery of imperial power.
But there are larger ripples, harder to measure, that move through history like seismic waves.
Ashoka's model of Buddhist kingship—the idea that a ruler should govern by Dhamma, that political power should be used to reduce suffering—spread with Buddhism itself across Asia. It influenced rulers in Sri Lanka, in Southeast Asia, in Tibet, in China. It became part of the conceptual vocabulary of governance in cultures that span nearly half the world's population.
The concept that a ruler is accountable not just for order but for justice, not just for conquest but for the welfare of the conquered—this idea, which Ashoka carved into stone, appears again and again in the history of political thought. It's in the writings of medieval Islamic scholars on the responsibilities of the caliph. It's in Confucian concepts of the ruler's duty to ensure the people's welfare. It's in the Christian idea of the king as shepherd of his flock.
And perhaps most importantly, Ashoka demonstrated something that would otherwise seem impossible: that power can repent.
This is not a given. Most tyrants who commit atrocities double down, justifying their cruelty as necessary, inevitable, virtuous even. They construct elaborate ideologies to explain why the people they killed deserved to die. They surround themselves with courtiers who assure them they were right.
Ashoka did the opposite. He looked at what he had done and said: This was wrong. I was wrong. And I will spend the rest of my life trying to be different.
That's not common. That's rare. That's precious.
And every time someone in power does it again—publicly admits error, commits to reform, uses their power to repair rather than to dominate—they are walking in footsteps carved 2,300 years ago on the blood-soaked fields of Kalinga.
VIII. The Question It Asks Us
Imagine this: A young soldier returns from war. He's seen things he can't unsee. He's done things he can't undo. At night, he dreams of faces—not enemies, not targets, but people. He wakes up shaking.
He goes to therapy. He talks to other veterans. He starts volunteering with an organization that provides humanitarian aid in the regions where he fought. He tells his story—not to excuse himself, not to claim victimhood, but to warn others. To say: I was told this was necessary. I was told this was right. I learned, too late, that it was neither.
He can't bring back the dead. He can't undo what was done. But he can refuse to pretend it didn't matter. He can refuse to let it happen again without protest. He can spend the rest of his life creating ripples that move in a different direction.
He is walking in Ashoka's footsteps.
Every whistleblower who exposes atrocities committed by their own government. Every former extremist who now works to de-radicalize others. Every person who held power, used it badly, and then chose a different path—they are part of this lineage.
Ashoka's pillars ask us: What will you do when you see the horror you've created? Will you justify it? Will you look away? Or will you weep, and then spend the rest of your life carving your repentance into stone?
Not because it erases the past. It doesn't. The dead remain dead. But because the living remain living, and they deserve a world where those who hold power are capable of transformation, where cruelty is not destiny, where the empire's spine can be realigned toward justice.
Coda: The Field Where the River Runs Clear
The Daya River still flows through Kalinga—now called Odisha—into the Bay of Bengal. It hasn't run red for 2,300 years. Farmers plant rice in the delta. Fishermen cast nets. Children swim where armies once clashed.
There's a memorial there now, at the battlefield. It's simple: a few stone tablets with inscriptions, a garden, a place for quiet reflection. Every year, on the anniversary of the battle, people gather. They light candles. They remember.
Not to celebrate the conquest. Not to glorify the empire. But to remember the moment an emperor looked at what power had done and chose differently. To remember that transformation is possible. To remember the crows, and the blood, and the choice made in the aftermath.
The pillars stand across the subcontinent, worn by weather, but still speaking. Still saying: You can change. Even if you have done terrible things, even if you hold terrible power, you can choose mercy. You can build instead of destroy. You can govern for welfare instead of glory.
The stone is patient. It will repeat this message for another 2,000 years, if necessary.
Until we finally learn.
Series: The Ancient Chorus, Part 2
Read Next: "What the Barons Demanded at Runnymede" – The story of the Magna Carta and the first time subjects told a king "No"
Ashoka's edicts (circa 268-232 BC) can be found throughout South Asia. Major pillar sites include Lauriya Nandangarh (Bihar), Sanchi (Madhya Pradesh), and Girnar (Gujarat). The Ashoka Chakra (wheel) appears on India's national flag. The lion capital is India's national emblem.